0.11/0.16 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_8820 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.18/0.37 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu 0.18/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.18/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.18/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.18/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.18/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.18/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.18/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:13:53 EDT 2023 0.18/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.24/0.53 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820 0.24/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.39/0.89 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA. 0.39/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_ho_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting pre_casc_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting additional_ho_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # new_ho_3 with pid 9156 completed with status 0 0.39/0.89 # Result found by new_ho_3 0.39/0.89 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA. 0.39/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_ho_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.39/0.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.39/0.89 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN 0.39/0.89 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN 0.39/0.89 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_bool_3 with 487s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_ho_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_bool_4 with 82s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting sh9 with 82s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # new_ho_3 with pid 9165 completed with status 0 0.39/0.89 # Result found by new_ho_3 0.39/0.89 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA. 0.39/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_ho_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.39/0.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.39/0.89 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN 0.39/0.89 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN 0.39/0.89 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_bool_3 with 487s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Starting new_ho_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.39/0.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s 0.39/0.89 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.39/0.89 0.39/0.89 # Proof found! 0.39/0.89 # SZS status Theorem 0.39/0.89 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_24, type, knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_40, type, bot_bo1785112429specID: set_Secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_46, type, ine: secrecy_specID > secrecy_Expression > $o). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_58, type, secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_61, type, secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_72, type, insert1671894227specID: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_80, type, correctCompositionIn: secrecy_specID > $o). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_89, type, subcomponents: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_95, type, p: secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_96, type, pq: secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_97, type, q: secrecy_specID). 0.39/0.89 thf(decl_98, type, key: secrecy_Keys). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_35_TBtheorem1a, axiom, ![X6:secrecy_specID, X17:secrecy_Expression, X7:secrecy_specID, X8:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X6 @ X17)=>(((subcomponents @ X6)=(insert1671894227specID @ X7 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X8 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))=>(((ine @ X7 @ X17)|(ine @ X8 @ X17))<=(correctCompositionIn @ X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_35_TBtheorem1a)). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine, axiom, ![X101:secrecy_specID, X102:secrecy_Keys]:((~((ine @ X101 @ (secrecy_kE @ X102)))<=~((knowle945212990e_know @ X101 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X102))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine)). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_2_assms_I1_J, axiom, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_2_assms_I1_J)). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_1_assms_I2_J, axiom, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_1_assms_I2_J)). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_3_assms_I3_J, axiom, ((subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_3_assms_I3_J)). 0.39/0.89 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ~((ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', conj_0)). 0.39/0.89 thf(fact_0_assms_I4_J, axiom, (correctCompositionIn @ pq), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TBiCvUxZp5/Vampire---4.8_8820', fact_0_assms_I4_J)). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X6:secrecy_specID, X17:secrecy_Expression, X7:secrecy_specID, X8:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X6 @ X17)=>(((subcomponents @ X6)=(insert1671894227specID @ X7 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X8 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))=>((correctCompositionIn @ X6)=>((ine @ X7 @ X17)|(ine @ X8 @ X17)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_35_TBtheorem1a])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X101:secrecy_specID, X102:secrecy_Keys]:((~(knowle945212990e_know @ X101 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X102))=>~(ine @ X101 @ (secrecy_kE @ X102)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1562:secrecy_specID, X1563:secrecy_Expression, X1564:secrecy_specID, X1565:secrecy_specID]:((~(ine @ X1562 @ X1563)|(((subcomponents @ X1562)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1564 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X1565 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))|(~(correctCompositionIn @ X1562)|((ine @ X1564 @ X1563)|(ine @ X1565 @ X1563)))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_10, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_assms_I1_J])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1467:secrecy_specID, X1468:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X1467 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X1468))|~(ine @ X1467 @ (secrecy_kE @ X1468)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_12, plain, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_assms_I2_J])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X17:secrecy_Expression, X8:secrecy_specID, X7:secrecy_specID, X6:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ X7 @ X17)|(ine @ X8 @ X17)|~((ine @ X6 @ X17))|((subcomponents @ X6)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X7 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X8 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))|~((correctCompositionIn @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_assms_I3_J])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_16, plain, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ p @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X6:secrecy_specID, X1:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X6 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X1))|~((ine @ X6 @ (secrecy_kE @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_18, plain, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ q @ (secrecy_kKS @ key))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X17:secrecy_Expression, X6:secrecy_specID]:(((ine @ p @ X17)|(ine @ q @ X17)|((subcomponents @ X6)!=(subcomponents @ pq))|~((ine @ X6 @ X17))|~((correctCompositionIn @ X6)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (ine @ pq @ (secrecy_kE @ key)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_21, plain, (correctCompositionIn @ pq), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms_I4_J])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_22, plain, ~((ine @ p @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_23, plain, ~((ine @ q @ (secrecy_kE @ key))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_17])). 0.39/0.89 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_21])]), c_0_22]), c_0_23]), ['proof']). 0.39/0.89 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.39/0.89 # Parsed axioms : 446 0.39/0.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 143 0.39/0.89 # Initial clauses : 625 0.39/0.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 27 0.39/0.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 598 0.39/0.89 # Processed clauses : 2907 0.39/0.89 # ...of these trivial : 68 0.39/0.89 # ...subsumed : 1618 0.39/0.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 1221 0.39/0.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 237 0.39/0.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.39/0.89 # Backward-subsumed : 11 0.39/0.89 # Backward-rewritten : 17 0.39/0.89 # Generated clauses : 9584 0.39/0.89 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8548 0.39/0.89 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.39/0.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 24 0.39/0.89 # Paramodulations : 9362 0.39/0.89 # Factorizations : 0 0.39/0.89 # NegExts : 0 0.39/0.89 # Equation resolutions : 258 0.39/0.89 # Total rewrite steps : 3142 0.39/0.89 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional check models : 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.39/0.89 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.39/0.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 740 0.39/0.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 74 0.39/0.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9 0.39/0.89 # Negative unit clauses : 21 0.39/0.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 636 0.39/0.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6573 0.39/0.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 24268 0.39/0.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.39/0.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 399 0.39/0.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 185246 0.39/0.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67255 0.39/0.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1395 0.39/0.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1114 0.39/0.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.39/0.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 181 0.39/0.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 131 0.39/0.89 # Condensation attempts : 2907 0.39/0.89 # Condensation successes : 6 0.39/0.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 175984 0.39/0.89 0.39/0.89 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.39/0.89 # User time : 0.319 s 0.39/0.89 # System time : 0.014 s 0.39/0.89 # Total time : 0.333 s 0.39/0.89 # Maximum resident set size: 5384 pages 0.39/0.90 0.39/0.90 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.39/0.90 # User time : 1.466 s 0.39/0.90 # System time : 0.054 s 0.39/0.90 # Total time : 1.520 s 0.39/0.90 # Maximum resident set size: 2632 pages 0.39/0.90 % E---3.1 exiting 0.39/0.90 EOF